IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters

[yannis]

Great fit @Matt. Do those fit similar to a 634 or a 666?

[goosehd]

@yannis …in the middle with aspects of both.

[yannis]

Thanks @goosehd

[Giles]

I know who his dealer is

[Tago Mago]

@Matt is lucky we don’t have the same tag size, otherwise I might be tempted to get those pants off him the next time we meet

[goosehd]

@Tago-Mago he’s like the Jason Momoa of Ironheart. Everyone want’s to get into @Matt pants

Please show that to Katie

[Matt]

Fortunately I have a dealer and a backup dealer. Depends on how specific of a fix I’m looking for.

[Matt]

Thanks to everyone. I love me some Busters. @goosehd is correct on fit. Just a hair slimmer than 634.

[ROman]

@Giles said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

I know who his dealer is

So do I.

[goosehd]

[Mizmazzle]

@Matt these are wicked and fit so damn good! congrats!!

[Daniel San]

@Matt
does your dealer have some 461s ?

[ROman]

Nein

[Giles]

I was going to answer for you, but thought it rude

[popvulture]

@Matt agreed. I was expecting them to be like 888s with a wider leg opening (my dream), but mine fit a good bit slimmer. Def between 666 and 634.

[Matt]

Yeah, it’s hard to compare to newer models because it’s so similar to those two which is why they went defunct. Sadly. They’re perfect for me. Although I have enough pairs now to last me for a bit so I really can’t complain.

[Matt]

@Giles said in IHXB01xUHR - Ultra Heavy Raw Beatle Busters:

I was going to answer for you, but thought it rude

First someone outed aitoro store which Filthy turned me onto and now you guys are outing my dealers!?!?

I’m gonna have to go super dark on you guys to get my aura of mystery back.

[ROman]

@Matt

[ROman]

My description were that the Beatle busters were a BIT higher rise, and a BIT slimmer than the 634. I loved the 1955, but these ran a very close second in fit to me.

[Matt]

You guys watch…. I’ll get Banksy to start custom tagging my patches. I will figure it out.