IH-666-UHR - Ultra Heavy - Devil's Fit (Slim Cut)

[Winchy]

@DennisEspunkt

Like Neph says, with some perseverance they will start to soften and stretch but be wary that there may still still be some shrinkage left in them so it'll be worth wearing them for as long as possible before giving them another wash/soak.

[Winchy]

We have a new batch of these that are going to be live on the website later on today which means the remaining two pairs of the previous batch are up for grabs at a bargain price….

666-UHR - Tag30 - USD250

Waist: 30.5 inches
Front: 9.5
Rear: 14.2
Thigh: 11.1
Knee: 7.8
Hem: 7.2
Inseam: 36.0

666-UHR - Tag31 - USD250

Waist: 32.0 inches
Front: 10.0
Rear: 14.6
Thigh: 11.2
Knee: 8.0
Hem: 7.5
Inseam: 36.2

Please email/PM either Paula or myself if interested.

[Madame Buttonfly]

The new 21/23oz UHR denim is very similar to previous - was woven on an older loom with a very slightly looser weave.  Basically it's the same denim but the sizing on these is coming up pretty different from the last run, so the sizing chart and photos on the 666-UHR webpage are being updated.

[Appfaff]

These measures are about perfect

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dion]

Seconded!

[DrBabyhorse]

Post soak fit pic.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

[Dion]

Nice! From the new batch?

[DrBabyhorse]

@Dion:

Nice! From the new batch?

Yes. The thigh and rear rise were perfect for me in this batch. I really like them.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

[neph93]

They do look very nice indeed. Much in the way of shrinkage? I was slightly dissappointed by how little the (old batch) UHR shrank.

[DrBabyhorse]

@neph93:

They do look very nice indeed. Much in the way of shrinkage? I was slightly dissappointed by how little the (old batch) UHR shrank.

I didn't measure, but it was only noticeable to me in the inseam. Waist and thighs stayed pretty much the same.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

[neph93]

^ that was my experience with the old batch too. Thanks.

[Dion]

Seconded. Besides the inseam everything else stayed the same on my UHR as well. Pretty surprisingly.

[Appfaff]

You rally hit the "target" with that fit pic DrBabyHorse

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[IndigoNoob]

I wish you guys had this in the 777 cut so bad. I need some bullet proof pants and all the fades I've seen of the UHR fabric are crazy

[Sam]

@IndigoNoob I believe we are making the 777-UHR but exclusively for Pronto in Thailand. So there's hope for you… 

[IndigoNoob]

@Sam guess I'll have to make a trip over to Thailand

[Peter]

@Sam and @Giles - are the 777-UHR still going to be available from other retailers post Pronto? I've got a vague memory of this.

[Giles]

No plans…..

[Peter]

Sad. Love the 666, but this iteration has like a 2" longer rear rise than my 666 in the same size. Not a fan. Need me some UHRs!

[Cali]

@DrBabyhorse:

@neph93:

They do look very nice indeed. Much in the way of shrinkage? I was slightly dissappointed by how little the (old batch) UHR shrank.

I didn't measure, but it was only noticeable to me in the inseam. Waist and thighs stayed pretty much the same.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

After slaving away for much too long on the IH site I think these are the jeans for me (finally, maybe) because all the measurements will work great.  Especially since you said you didn't notice any shrinkage in the thigh.

Does that seem to be the trend with this run of the UHR?  The inseam shrinks but the thigh and waist remain mostly unchanged?  I'd like the waist to shrink, just not the thigh.